Field review | Education homework help

I am observing a high school chemistry class recently. Write a review of the classroom observations.  

Field Review – A 3-5 page paper on lessons learned from fieldwork observations. Suggested questions to focus reflection include: How did the teacher balance an inquiry-based classroom with classroom management? What strategies did they employ to engage all students? How did the teacher differentiate instruction for different academic levels? What strategies would you employ in your classroom in order to fit your teaching style?

*The field review should really focus on a theme in your observations (student engagement, inquiry, behavior management, …)

Select and review first 10 sources

Please pay attention to the Matrix Template!!! My topic is Standards-based grading, Standards-based assessments or anything along those lines. The references have to be within 2 years.


For this exercise, remember to focus on sources related to RESEARCH STUDIES. Add the 10 articles to the matrix, and prepare a full reference list of the 10 sources using APA style.

In addition, you will begin to review each source in the NARRATIVE format expected for literature review. Group the 10 sources gathered thus far under categorical or theme headings and conduct a systematic review of each source as outlined in your readings. Be sure to utilize the resources to guide your writing and also incorporate the divergent perspectives or similarities between findings. 5 to 7 pages plus the matrix in the appendix after the reference list (not included in page count)

References: A full references list with at least 10 sources in APA style

Article review ” a case for student communication in online classes”

Format: APA

Number of Words: 600 minimum

Deadline: February 28, 2017


Review “Read-Only Participants: A Case for Student Communication in Online Classes,” by Nagel, Blignaut, and Cronje, which was asisigned to be read in Topic 1.

After reading the article, write a 600-word summary of it.

Refer to the guidelines for writing an effective summary presented in the Lecture 2 as a guide.

Be sure to include a discussion of the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Draft of literature review (the effects of single parenting on

Please review the attachments to help complete the below assignment:

My initial research topic was going to be on childhood obesity, but being that I’m pursuing a EDd degree, I would like to change my topic to “The effects of single parenting on academic achievement”

So please try to research new topic while incorporating some of old articles to complete assignment.

If you have any questions on the assignment, please let me know before accepting the assignment.

For Assignment 1, you will submit your first draft of the literature review using a minimum of 10 sources gathered over the weeks. The purpose of conducting and writing a literature review is to provide an evaluative discussion of the existing research related to your proposed study and gathered thus far, highlight the gaps that remain in the literature, and establish a context and theoretical basis for your study.

As you begin writing this draft of the literature review, consider the following guidelines:You are writing to inform/educate your audience. Who is your audience? How much do they know about your research topic?You are trying to convince your audience you are competent as a researcher, dealing with your topic and proposed research question. You do this by evaluating and integrating/synthesizing the literature, by examining and naming the patterns existing among the articles, and by discussing the studies you consider strongest within the body of literature you have reviewed.You also do this by stating clearly in the beginning your research topic and your proposed research question, a succinct statement of the significance of this topic and question–and, as always your purpose for writing this literature review and your map of the themes/major concepts you intend to evaluate and synthesize.You identify the weaknesses and/or gaps you found in the literature, as well as the researchers’ suggestions for additional research. A weakness or a gap may be small; for example, a certain population may not have yet been researched for your topic.You give clear credit for direct quotes and ideas not original to you. Be overly cautious to avoid plagiarism, using Turnitin as a form of feedback that you have done this well.A perfect literature review does not exist in a first draft. Submitting a first draft provides you with feedback from your instructor, and it supports your efforts to perfect your literature review .Many writers of literature reviews concentrate on the body of their literature review first and then write the introduction and the summary near the end of their writing. This can be useful, if you are absolutely clear about your purpose for writing this literature review and have your research question clearly written and in front of you, as you state and develop your themes.Allow time (12–24 hours) to put your first draft aside, prior to submitting it to your instructor. Reread your first draft with a fresh mind, and then make any minor adjustments. Use the spell check function on your computer to review your first draft. Proofread your paper in addition to using spell check. And…if at all possible, ask someone to read your paper out loud while you listen, to be as sure as possible that you are very clear in what you are saying.

Write your first draft of the literature review in a minimum of 10 double-spaced pages as a Word document. In your literature review, you should have done the following:Begun with an introduction that showed the significance of the topic as well as its historical context and/or how it fits in the broader scholarly literature in this field, while also clearly stating the research topic and the research question [in question form], your for this literature review and the of the major themes that will form the body of the paper.Integrated and evaluated the literature, dividing the body into the patterns you have found within the articles you reviewed. Note: You should have a minimum of 10 articles for your review, shown on the Reference page; at least 1/2 should be empirical studies, indicated by using **.Discussed which studies you considered stronger and your rationaleIdentified the gaps in the literature and the suggestions for future research, mentioned by researchers.Evaluated and synthesized the literature you chose.Given credit for direct quotes and ideas not original to you, using careful quotation and citation format, as needed.Avoided plagiarism, cautiously and judiciously.Ended with a summary that restated the purpose and map, while giving an overall evaluation of what you considered the most important elements of this review.Used spell check to review the first draft and proofread after using spell check.Had another reader review your paper, possibly out loud, with you carefully listening for the clarity and sense making.By the due date assigned, submit your first draft of the literature review in Word document format to the Submissions Area. Name your file W7000_M6_A1_lastname_firstinitial.doc.  You will receive feedback from your facilitator on your literature review by the beginning of Module 7. Based on the feedback received and the Turnitin report, you will make corrections and revisions during Module 7 to prepare your final submission of your literature review by the end of Module 7.

Review the originality report and make sure all borrowed material has been accurately cited and appropriately paraphrased or quoted to prepare your final submission of your literature review by the end of Module 7.All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.Please make sure you review the elements of the grading criteria and associated points carefully and make sure your assignment has addressed all the elements and in enough detail to merit full points.

Scholarly Articles for the new topic to help complete above assignment (feel free to do your own research as well:

Journal artical review | EDSP 410 – Instructional Adaptation for Special Education (D) | Liberty University




Differentiation is a widely used framework, incorporating a variety of strategies for student 

success. Differentiated Instruction was developed by Carol Ann Tomlinson many years ago.  Her 

goal was to provide a framework to help teachers meet the needs of the growing numbers of 

diverse students found in a classroom.  The goal of differentiated instruction is to use flexible 

groupings during the academic day to provide specific instruction to each groups’ needs.  Using 

initial assessment to determine readiness and teaching in the student’s zone of proximal 

development, the teacher can group students according to their need, using effective teaching 

strategies. The three elements of instruction to meet the needs of the students are content, 

process, and product. Content is what is taught; process is what will be used to teach; product is 

how students show they have learned the concept.    


For this Journal Article Review: Differentiation Strategy Assignment, you will choose one of 

the strategies used to differentiate instruction for a specific group of students. This is not about 

differentiated instruction on a whole, but a specific strategy used in a differentiated classroom. 

Article reviews enable you to think critically and to synthesize information. 

In this course, you will conduct two separate Journal Article Review: Differentiation Strategy 

Assignments on differentiated instruction strategies – a different strategy for each. Search for 

articles from the online Jerry Falwell Library that discuss various differentiated instruction 

strategies – not differentiated instruction. All articles used must have been published within the 

last 5 years.

After reading the article thoroughly, you will summarize and critique the peer-reviewed 

academic journal article in your own words. The summary must include:

 The article’s title and purpose

 Identification of the author(s) of the article and their qualifications

 A review of the main points of the article

 A summary of the differentiated instruction strategy


After the summary, you will provide a critique by reflecting on the article’s effectiveness. Avoid 

focusing on mechanics (e.g. “too wordy”, “too long”, etc.) and instead focus on the content of 

the article. This is an opportunity to demonstrate critical thinking. The critique must include:

 Your evaluation of the article’s strengths and weaknesses.

 Your overall takeaway from the article; your personal reaction and reflections.

 Examples of how you can apply the concepts in your classroom

Write a review and a meta-review (a review of the reviews) of the work. Research the circumstances behind the creation of the album, the public reception at the time, the critical reviews, and the current consensus

Write a review and a meta-review (a review of the reviews) of the work. Research the circumstances behind the creation of the album, the public reception at the time, the critical reviews, and the current consensus

Book review for money, power, politics class

Here is information on the Ralph Nader Essay regarding his book Breaking Through Power: It’s Easier Than We Think that includes selected analysis on one of the three main branches of federal government. This is worth 50 pts. and is due by Monday, November 19, 11:59 P.M. (extended) The essay should be uploaded in Canvas. Note that much of the course material previously covered may be useful as context for this assignment, especially regarding the media, and the presidential election may also provide interesting fodder for discussion in this essay. This assignment consists of students drafting an essay based on Ralph Nader’s book, and readings relating to one of the following covered in the Parenti text: the Legislative, Executive, or Judicial Branches of US Government. These are discussed in Parenti′s chapters 15, 16, or 18 (based on the Congress, the Presidency, and/or the Supreme Court respectively, so choose ONE of these chapters from Parenti to address its relation to Nader′s thesis in Breaking Through Power). This essay may also provide an opportunity to expand on previous Posts and tie in major course themes and contemporary news examples relating to the intersection of money, power, and politics. That said, the way we are addressing such matters for this particular essay assignment is through the prism of Nader’s book first and foremost, so please do read it in its entirety. This is an assignment that doesn′t just focus on how the system works and for whom, but how we the people can be more meaningful participants in representative government. In short, Nader offers what he thinks are solutions to the conflicts between money, power, and politics. So, to recap: Please carefully read the Nader book Breaking Through Power and then also choose ONE of the thematic chapters on the three branches of US government in Parenti listed above for a detailed essay based on subsequent Prompts provided for each (topically, that means in addition to Nader, choose one of these- Congress, the Presidency, or the Supreme Court). The essay should be roughly 1,000 to 1,500 words, properly cited in Chicago Style with endnotes or footnotes, and be in 12 pt. Times New Roman font with one inch margins. Students should not only review the Nader, Parenti texts, but could also incorporate other sources and readings from the term as deemed relevant. Regarding Nader’s book: Consider the following in your essay: Breaking Through Power: It’s Easier Than We Think is a brief history of the rise and impact of the plutocratic class on the democratic institutions of government in the United States. Nader reflects on decades of his own efforts, while noting those of many others, to create a more democratic and responsive political system for We the People, not the corporate oligarchic class. Briefly discuss how Nader says we got to our current state of affairs and what we can do about it by following the questions below… In your essay, address the four main sections of Nader’s work regarding how we have a plutocracy of maximums and a democracy of minimums (which sounds strikingly similar to Parenti’s title, Democracy for the Few). How does Nader suggest how the system is rigged for the plutocracy? How does he suggest we organize resistance and/or change? Why does Nader believe democracy can work? Be specific. Now, after reading Nader’s book and these aforementioned queries, consider how ONE of the following chapters from Parenti connects to Nader′s overall arguments and weave it into your essay content while addressing the previous points above. Remember, only choose ONE of the Parenti chapters below to merge into your thoughts about Breaking Through Power. Hint: The chapter on Congress is a logical one to select given Nader′s arguments, however, they also apply to the Executive and Judicial branches, so it is up to you to decide which of the Parenti chapters you wish to address and include in the Nader essay. Also, see the Foreword Nader wrote for United States of Distraction for an overview of his critique of the political economy of American democracy. Again, consider the above points regarding Nader′s work, and then choose ONE of the following as the Prompt for your essay. 1. On the Congress (Parenti chapter 15)- Congress: The Pocketing of Power (this one may be the easiest to incorporate into the essay, but the choice is up to you). How representative of the population is the Congress of the US? What role does lobbying play in crafting public policy? How does money potentially corrupt the democratic process in Congress? Parenti and Nader both muse how can we create a Congress that is more responsive to voters and less responsive to moneyed interests and legislative manipulators. Discuss. What are your overall thoughts about the intersection of money, power, and politics regarding Congress?