StrategicTraining ofHealthcareWorkforceon Policies,Procedures,andRegulation
This assignment will be one of several throughout the Ph.D. program that we use to help you prepare for the dissertation process. One of the core competencies necessary to succeed in a doctoral program is the ability to identify other research that pertains to your own. This means you’ll have to identify related research, read the papers, and assimilate prior work into your research. An annotated bibliography helps you develop and hone these research skills.
The paper must be in a correct APA format, use correct grammar, and will need to include at least five (5) resources, ALL of which must:
1) Be current. Published within the last few years.
2) Be peer-reviewed.
3) Relate directly to defense in depth in the context of protecting National Infrastructure.
Remember that an annotation is not the same as an abstract. Abstracts are descriptive. Your annotations are to be evaluative and critical. Give me enough information for me to decide if I’m interested enough to read the paper, and also how you perceive the paper. Do not go skimpy on these annotations, but DO NOT write too much here. Quality is far more critical than quantity. This exercise is for each of you to demonstrate that you can identify, categorize, and digest multiple research papers.
The resources you choose must be peer-reviewed. That means the paper must have undergone a formal peer review before being published in a journal or presented at a conference. You must ensure that your resources have undergone rigorous reviews. In most cases, you can find out the review process for a conference or journal by visiting the appropriate web site. Do not merely assume that a resource is peer-reviewed – check it out.
Here are a few URLs with additional information: (I strongly suggest that you look at these. Really.)
http://libguides.enc.edu/writing_basics/annotatedbib/apa <<<< Check out the “Rules! Rules! rules!” section
PLAGIARISM FREE “A” WORK IN 12 HOURS or LESS RELIGION WORK
Strategic Analysis Report for Verizon
Guidelines & Rubric
Overall Objective: To analyze Verizon’s current operations and provide strategic recommendations to the board of directors in order to answer how to protect and strengthen a current competitive advantage, or to create a new competitive advantage and then protect and strengthen it. The recommendations should be creative, should leverage Verizon’s current strengths and/or address their significant weakness, and should be supported with sound financial analysis and justification.
my part is about the following titles below, please stick to what is required, and use scholar cites and journals + please add a cited page,
put some charts and numbers and financial ratios and (((explain it))).
a. Strategic Recommendation(s)
In this section you should explain in detail your strategic recommendation(s) for your client. Use the business strategy analysis tools discussed in lecture and your lab to do this. You are strongly encouraged to use detailed and insightful financial analysis for this section of your report. A good way to present the results of the analysis is to provide the details in an appendix and reference them in the final results in your report. This will make the report more clear and readable than unnecessary narrative.
You should allocate more discussion to the most important elements of analysis as they relate to your recommendation(s). The recommendation(s) should leverage what you determine is Verizon’s SCA and/or address what you determine is their biggest problem. The recommendation(s) should be profitable, creative, feasible, in line with their current vision and mission, in line with the external environment, an acceptable risk, and achievable in a reasonable time frame. Be sure to work with the entire team on the recommendation(s) to be as accurate and comprehensible as possible in addressing each of the criteria noted above.
b. Justification of Recommendations
In this section you will address the feasibility of the recommendation(s). For instance, does Verizon have enough resources to effectively implement the recommendations? How will they cover costs? How does the profitability of the recommendation(s) compare to Verizon’s current profitability. What are the expected risks associated with the recommendation (s)? Support your position with facts that you find from your industry research and related research on Verizon. If you make assumptions, state these assumptions and why you believe the assumptions are appropriate.
b. The economic logic of your recommendation is a key part of this section. Explore this fully and use appropriate financial measures to evaluate your recommendation(s). Based on your findings of profitability and feasibility, Verizon’s board should be convinced it is worth the risk to implement your recommendation(s). Typically, financial measure such as ROI, WACC, IRR, NPV are used to support the economic feasibility of a recommendation. Use your analysis to convince the board that your recommendations are well-developed and makes sense for the company. Note that your measures should relate closely to how performance in Verizon’s industry is measured as well as how competitive advantage is measured.
Include a timeline/flowchart that summarizes the implementation of the recommendation(s) and when the expected results for Verizon would occur (payback period).
look below to see the grading rubric
Strategic Recommendation(s) – you may choose more than one
Identify the appropriate strategy(s) to be undertaken.
What do you want to do with the company?
Pick a strategic move that you think the company should make and describe in detail how they should implement it. It should coincide with their current business level strategy
Support your recommendation with financial analysis
You must include a clear and definitive financial analysis as part of your recommendations (e.g., how much will it cost, where will the money come from,
article that needs to be reviewed:
***** perform a brief review of the literature and evidence (on the article posted above.). Briefly describe study design, methodology, and number of participants. Include a statement on the quality of the research.
PLAGIARISM FREE “A” WORK RELIGIOUS ASSIGNMENT
Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study.
Provide a 500 word (or 2 pages double spaced) minimum reflection.
Use of proper4- APA formatting and citations. If supporting evidence from outside resources is used those must be properly cited.
Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.
Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired work environment.
You should NOT, provide an overview of the assignments assigned in the course. The assignment asks that you reflect how the knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives were applied or could be applied in the workplace.
My role : Software Quality Engineer
Read through the article or watch the video OR PODCAST at the following link:
This course focuses on the business sector commonly called charitable nonprofits. These organizations are classified under Section 501(c)(3) of the IRS tax code. They are exempt from federal taxes, allowed to accept tax-exempt contributions, and not allowed to lobby or use their funds to support candidates for public office. These organizations will be studied during this course, beginning with the one you choose to use for your final project. As part of your strategic analysis, you will look at all aspects of the organization, interview members of the organization, and even suggest a plan for making the organization more successful.
In your journal assignment, please address the following:
- Identify a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that you would like to study throughout the course.
- For additional ideas on which not-for-profit organization to select, visit the National Council of Nonprofits website.
- If you would like to research a not-for-profit organization in your neighborhood, use your browser to search for the name of your city and the words “not-for-profit,” “nonprofit,” or “volunteer opportunities.” You should find several organizations to choose from.
- In your journal assignment, complete the following:
- Identify the not-for-profit organization that you have chosen for your final project.
- Explain why you chose this not-for-profit organization. What appealed to you? Why is this organization a good candidate for the strategic analysis that you will perform for the final project?
Guidelines for Submission: Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. These journal assignments should be at least 250 words in length.
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review the MHHS Case Study and the two required chapters from the Knapp, VandeCreek, and Fingerhut book, Practical Ethics for Psychologists: A Positive Approach: Foundations of Ethical Behavior and Ethical Decision Making.
Identify a minimum of one ethical dilemma that you have identified in the MHHS case study. Discuss the challenges you would face as a human services provider when dealing with this issue. How would you overcome these challenges? As you respond to this question consider how you would deal with this issue based on your future role in a human services organization. If you plan a direct service route vs. a leadership route how does this impact how you would approach the issue? Your post should contain a minimum of 400 words.
Outline and References
[WLO: 2] [CLOs: 4, 5]
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the materials in the writing center on Outlining (Links to an external site.) and Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.). Create an outline for your Week 5 Final Project. Your outline should include the thesis or central argument, along with any main topics and support to be included in your final project. Include a minimum of three references you plan to use for your final project.
In your paper,
- Create a comprehensive outline that includes headings and subheadings.
- Identify the thesis or central argument in the outline.
- Outline the main topics with support.
- Generate a list of three references you plan to use for your paper.
The Outline and References paper
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.