Read the case study I attached ( Larom ) and either support or disagree with the expert’s commentary.
The point is for you to form a credible ethical argument about some aspect of the case study.
Since the experts don’t always agree, there is unlikely to be a single correct interpretation.
This assignment is about whether you can logically support your own analysis of the published case study.
Since I don’t have the commentaries memorized, be specific about which aspect of the commentary you are agreeing or disagreeing with. Also be specific about your evidence/justification for your position.
One paragraph might be enough, but the assignment certainly shouldn’t take more than 2 (short) paragraphs.
